I don't know that etymology is the right word. It's just that James
and I were snookered when it came to making comparisons of
measurements made separately by us using pendulums. There is no
official common scale (excepting one in England which for some
strange reason requires participants to obtain a 100 gram cube of
clear quartz and charge (energise) it to a certain rate. The cube
would be very costly.) So we worked out a way of doing it a lot
simpler than that. We could have called the process 'hedleytronics'
but 'pytronics' is shorter and seems to roll off the tongue easier.
That's all.
I learned to use the Bovis-scale. It runs from 0 to about 12,000.
Healthy humans have a Bovis-value of about 6,500; extremely good
water or food can get as high as 7,000-13,000 which then has a
beneficial effect on your own life-energy. Some products sold on the
internet claim to give water Bovis-values of as much as 3 million,
but I can't imagine anything with products like that. If you even
look at that, you should fly straight to the highest hierarchies if
it's true what they claim. I never meassured anything higher than
13,000.
Visit
http://www.britishdowsers.org/EEG_site/articles/auc2001_issue22/Resonance&PeaceAlign_M.htm
for a report of someone using the Bovis-scale.
As an example. If using a pendulum I measured my energy first thing
in the morning, it would come out in the region of 945 units on my
personal scale. James' personal scale rates it at 9.45. (We checked
this variation over a range of items and it held true.) The
pytronic standard we arrived at divided my scale by 10 and
multiplied James' scale by ten, giving us a common measurement of
94.5.
The item we use for the standard is a CD permanently energised to
1,000 pytrons. My personal scale is ten times that, James' that
divided by ten.
It does work for other people too.
Another thought: I consider some 'remedies' that I use on my garden
as merely 'information' and others as merely 'energy'. If I spray
preparations, I mix 'information' (the prep itself) and add a lot of
'energy' (the conscious stirring) to it to bring the message across.
An easy way to distinguish between 'information' and 'energy' is to
ask yourself the question: "if I use more, will the effect be
better?". More of the same 'information' is like having three
identical newspapers at your breakfasttable: it doesn't bring you
anything more than having one. Adding more 'energy', might (!) have
an improved effect: more logs on a fire gives more warmth.
To broadcast the information, you always need energy. I imagine that
in Hugh's broadcasters, in the wells you put the information, and
the energy to braodcast them is being generated by the
coils/circuitry + by the conscious act of you putting this
information in there. Orgon-accumulators are merely broadcasting
'energy' rather than information.
Does this make any sense to you? And how would potentized preps fit in this?
Cheers Arjen Huese
_______________________________________________
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow