----------------------------------------------------------- New Message on BDOTNET
----------------------------------------------------------- From: Shekhar Message 5 in Discussion Hi srinivas, Thanks for your reply, i am sorry that i have not explained my requirement properly, It is right that the both the solution (read uncommitted and nolock) will give me uncommitted data which is risk to data integrity, all i want is if one of the transaction is updating the data then other transaction should be able to read the last committed data not the uncommitted data, please let me know can i handle this in sql, as i don't want go read uncommitted isolation level. However to take care data loss i am using time stamp method while updation. thank you shekhar ----------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this e-mail, or change how often it arrives, go to your E-mail Settings. http://groups.msn.com/BDotNet/_emailsettings.msnw Need help? If you've forgotten your password, please go to Passport Member Services. http://groups.msn.com/_passportredir.msnw?ppmprop=help For other questions or feedback, go to our Contact Us page. http://groups.msn.com/contact If you do not want to receive future e-mail from this MSN group, or if you received this message by mistake, please click the "Remove" link below. On the pre-addressed e-mail message that opens, simply click "Send". Your e-mail address will be deleted from this group's mailing list. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
