On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:51:22PM -0400, W. Trevor King wrote:
> 1) Use a better file system.  There's no fundamental difference
>   between a file system and a database like MySQL.  With a properly
>   tuned filesystem geared towards many small files, BE's current
>   file-based backends should perform acceptably.

I ran the tests on a tmpfs partition on the same computer instead.  I
didn't deactivat swapping, but there wasn't much else on the computer
during the test run, so I doubt it swapped much.  The results were
suprisingly similar to the other direct-access runs.  I'll attach all
the results here (as well as the tmpfs script) for those interested in
the raw numbers.

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'.
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt
1       0.47
2       0.49
4       0.49
8       0.52
16      0.58
32      0.70
64      0.97
128     1.56
256     2.79
512     5.48
1024    11.72
2048    28.47
4096    82.66
1       0.47
2       0.49
4       0.49
8       0.53
16      0.58
32      0.70
64      0.96
128     1.52
256     2.73
512     5.43
1024    11.55
2048    28.08
4096    74.36
1       0.29
2       0.30
4       0.34
8       0.39
16      0.49
32      0.72
64      1.19
128     2.17
256     4.22
512     8.61
1024    17.64
2048    37.93
4096    91.38
1       0.47
2       0.48
4       0.50
8       0.52
16      0.58
32      0.70
64      0.96
128     1.53
256     2.78
512     5.48
1024    11.80
2048    28.35
4096    74.89

Attachment: benchmark-be-list.sh
Description: Bourne shell script

Attachment: pgpxiEKXda17b.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Be-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel

Reply via email to