Dear Gerald, once again you are right: I should not use the word "high" so easily. By the way, thanks again for your help.
Alberto Depends on your definition of HIGH. GPMC is 100MHZ and up to 16Bits wide. > > Gerald > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Alberto Potenza > <alberto....@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Look, >> I should have 32-bit data generated with a frequency f =100kHz. >> Which means a data throughput of 3.2Mb/s. >> With SPI I should have the possibility to work with a data throughput of >> 48Mb/s (which is more than 10 times faster). >> I already know your question: >> "But in the previous post you said that you needed GPMC for high data >> throughput...but it seems to be not...why?" >> Because I will probably will asked to manage an higher data throughput in >> a couple of years, so I decided to save time now... >> >> But right now it seems that SPI is the best compromise between >> performance and realization-time. >> >> Thanks a lot for your effort. >> >> Regards. >> >> Alberto >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Il giorno venerdì 11 ottobre 2013 14:26:36 UTC+2, Gerald ha scritto: >> >>> Is that going to be fast enough for your application? >>> >>> Gerald >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BeagleBoard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
