"BTW, How are you going to add an LCD to the RPi, since you only have the
HDMI, and no LCD connector?"

SPI ? I2C ? UART ? Pretty sure even the rPI has two of the three listed  .
.. even if it does only have 16 or so GPIO's exposed.


On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ulf Samuelsson <[email protected]>wrote:

>  2013-12-29 20:41, Anguel skrev:
>
>
> On Monday, December 23, 2013 10:21:55 PM UTC+1, Terry Storm wrote:
>>
>>
>> A little birdy told me that Angstrom has been abandoned for the BBB ??
>>
>>
> Terry, I will comment on this topic risking to get some angry feedback
> from other people posting here. My theory is the following: Koen Kooi was
> the one who did all Angstrom development and answered all related questions
> in groups, forums and IRC in the past (just look around). According to his
> public Google profile he is not working for CircuitCo anymore but for
> Linaro. Since then, nobody really cares about Angstrom. Angstrom server is
> down for a long time, no updates, etc.
>
>
>
> git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git
>
> git checkout -b Yocto1.5 origin/angstrom-v2013.12-yocto1.5
>
> git log
>
> commit 0b3a4809fafebc742e7a2976ee7570a652547b71
> Author: Koen Kooi <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Dec 16 20:53:41 2013 +0100
>
>     layerman: switch OE-core to angstrom branch
>
>     Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi 
> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>
> commit 55e9feb35c3a43474178e7b1be18c17e3128a611
> Author: Koen Kooi <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> Date:   Sat Dec 7 09:11:03 2013 +0100
>
>     layerman: switch meta-oe to angstrom staging branch
>
>     Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi 
> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>
> commit 466ad02bec29b1499883f5d8b4540b0949cdd9d6
> Author: Koen Kooi <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> Date:   Fri Dec 6 18:57:45 2013 +0100
>
>
> Does not sound that dead to me....
>
>
>
>   A long time ago, I had also posted some issues + bug fixes to
> meta-beagleboard but there was no reaction.
>
>  Most people on #beagle IRC have no idea about Angstrom or Openembedded,
> so no community support there too.
>
> You want to post to the openembedded mailing lists.
>
>  Additionally, Angstrom is a "strange" Linux distro and only a few people
> know about its details. Afaik it was Koen Kooi who chose it for the BBB for
> some reason. Another big problem that BBB development faces is the need to
> switch to device tree.
>
>
> When I build Angstrom for the Beaglebone, it is using device trees.
>
>
>  Additionally, I personally don't understand why so much has been
> invested in some stupid fancy on-board development tools etc. instead of
> getting the basic things done properly.
>
>  Maybe this was required by some marketing manager to be able to fool new
> developers that the BBB is very user friendly and to buy the board...
>
> Regarding the BBB kernel, afaik all the work is done by RobertCNelson who
> is also working on Ubuntu/Debian development.
>
> So what could be our options for the future of the BBB:
> 1. We can hope that Ubuntu/Debian for BBB get better and better and
> finally replace Angstrom as the official distro.
> 2. Another possibility is that TI relases a new version of their EZSDK
> with support for a new kernel, device tree, latest Qt and 3D. But according
> to the work done so far, people don't expect much from TI.
>
> TI Supports their kernel at
> git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-ti
> which contains linux-3.12
>
>
>  3. My hope is that the very active developers at Buildroot soon have
> good support for the BBB, so we can get access to new software packages and
> a very good embedded build system and we could finally forget Angstrom.
>
> Angstrom is based on openembedded-core and meta-openembedded, but is not
> using the standard repos.
> You need to check out the Yocto-1.5 branch to get access to the latest
> stuff though.
> If you clone the master, you do not see much development,since this is
> based on Yocto-1.3 which sees little development.
>
> Buildroot is not Yocto compliant, which means that they will not follow
> mainstream development funded by large companies.
>
>
>  No matter what people tell you, BBB is very very very far from the
> Raspberry Pi's software quality and its huge community.
> CircuitCo and TI advertise the BBB wherever they can but their promises
> are far from reality.
> Why does CircuitCo still advertise their LCDs as working with latest
> Angstrom after all the discussions I had with them here in the groups?
>
> Many people here tell you that everybody should learn Linux at bare metal
> level and should be able to write his own kernel drivers to get simple
> things done. I don't agree,
>
>  I think that manufacturers like TI and CircuitCo should offer you some
> working drivers and a stable basis to get started with.
>
> I agree 100%.
>
>
>  We are buying their chips! Currently they don't support us.
> I have even read postings from expert developers who don't get why the BBB
> kernel is organized in the way it is, so things are very complex.
>
>   I do not understand why you refer it as the BBB kernel.
> Angstrom meta-beagleboard allows you to compile the linux kernel with some
> extra patches for the am335x chips,
> using a selected kernel configuration.
>
> This is exactly what they are doing in the Buildroot project, exept that
> they do not keep track of the beaglebone
> so the number of available patches are minimal.
>
> Most embedded chip companies are focused on aligning themselves with the
> Yocto project.
> Yocto is barebone, and Angstom allows for much more advanced functionality.
>
>
>
>
> If you are a new developer you are just not able to learn everything, even
> if you don't do anything else in your job. IMHO this means: Only wealthy
> big companies can afford to hire dozens of developers to develop one
> product they are going to sell in masses. And if this is the only
> possibility, this is a very very bad thing for Embedded Linux.
>
> There are plenty of small companies which use Embedded Linux.
>
>
>  The BBB and R Pi are wonderful boards for single developers or small
> companies who have good ideas but don't have the money and time to do
> everything from scratch. Or like me, they develop products which are needed
> by e.g. universities but are not expected to ship in large quantities.
> Unfortunately, the obstacles we currently see with the BBB and most other
> embedded boards simply prevent such good product ideas to become real
> products. Small developers and hobbyists are just wasting their time
> believing the marketing promises of big manufacturers.
>
> The BBB has better HW than the R Pi but in the meantime I ask myself -
> what is it good for if the board does not have working software and if
> nobody can help you.
> So I am seriously considering to switch to the RPi.
>
>
> There are plenty of people that can help you, but if you want to get help
> for free, then that is a different deal.
>
> BTW, How are you going to add an LCD to the RPi, since you only have the
> HDMI, and no LCD connector?
> You can't build your own board.
> If you are not happy with the Beaglebone, you can find other AM335x boards
> where the LCD support may be working.
>
>
>  Regards,
> Anguel
>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/WYrk-JUAkbM/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Ulf Samuelsson
>
>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to