IMHO, many people will pay a few dollars more for BBB hardware to cover for 
a software professional salary.
Do not let the BBB die.

On Sunday, January 5, 2014 11:35:34 AM UTC+11, William Hermans wrote:
>
> Personally, I'd rather that TI kept their sticky paws off of the 
> development as much as possible. Watching the SGX/DRM driver progression 
> should be warning enough.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 5:24 PM, John Syne <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Anguel <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>> Reply-To: <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>> Date: Saturday, January 4, 2014 at 3:09 PM
>> To: <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>> Cc: <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Abandoned for BBB? Rumor + a Rant
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 4, 2014 3:20:07 PM UTC+1, Jason Kridner wrote:
>>>
>>> We are working with Robert Nelson's Debian images to try to produce an 
>>> out-of-box experience on par with the Angstrom images. Once we have a 
>>> few more features in, namely an updated Cloud9 IDE that works with 
>>> node 0.10, then we'll push out a beta image broadly for testing.
>>
>>
>> It is good news that you are working with Robert on Debian. IMHO this is 
>> the way to go. Robert is doing so much for the BBB community. TI should 
>> support him in every way they can.
>> It is a fact that BBB developer resources are extremely limited. So 
>> efforts should really concentrate on getting the serious stuff working 
>> properly, I mean the basic things a serious developer needs: kernel + 
>> stability + Qt, because Linux is used for touch GUIs, not as a desktop 
>> replacement.
>> For me Linux Desktops, Cloud9, USB networking etc. is just a big waste of 
>> precious development time, unless the intention is to fool new customers 
>> that the BBB is something easy to use. This is definitely not the case and 
>> will never be! Just have a look at all the posts in this thread.
>>
>> Actually, Cloud9 together with DojoToolKit is amazing for developing Web 
>> based GUI. Using websockets makes the GUI very responsive.  
>>
>>
>>
>> The LCD Cape vendors should push support for their hardware into 
>>> https://github.com/beagleboard/kernel and 
>>> https://github.com/beagleboard/cape-firmware. CircuitCo does so. 
>>> Github pull requests are the best way to do so. 
>>>
>>
>> The problem with touch was that someone ported the ADC / touchscreen 
>> stuff from an upcoming TI kernel to the 3.8 kernel and some things broke. 
>> Then this somebody just did not have the time to fix the bugs and they 
>> stayed there. I already discussed this in another thread.
>>
>> Use Capacitive based touchscreen. These interface via USB.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anguel
>>
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>  -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to