On 30/01/14 18:09, David M. wrote: > Yes,the kernel documentation is bedtime reading. Thanks.
:) > My example may have been too simple--I have /two/ I2C devices, the RTC and a > Solomon SSD1306 display at 3C on the same bus. I have multiple devices as well, three on the current setup one of which is at 0x48 and having dev@48 makes no difference, still works. > I still think it's ambiguous, and I am going to spell out the radix, always. Interestingly, if you ever try to get a change accepted in the mainstream kernel that does that in the node name you'll get told to remove it. But either way, it's entirely up to you. Only requirement from the doc is that the names are unique. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
