Varieties and choices are always nice. It invites competition, innovation, improvement, etc. Most likely all of those will build the kernel. Picking the best one is up to you. If you're interested in finding out which one is currently the best you could build a kernel with each and then run a set of benchmarks on them.
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:33:29 AM UTC-5, siva kumar wrote: > > hai all, > i found there are so many compilers available for beaglebone black based > on which os installed > after googled i found > [1] generic ----- arm-linux-gnueabi- , > [2] angstrom ----- arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi- > [3] linaro ----- arm-linux-gnueabihf- > > and some others like > > [4] arm-none-linux-gnu- > [5] arm-linux-gnu- > > these are the compilers available to build a kernel for beaglebone black . > > my ques > > why should these many varieties available ?? > any how the processors are same for all the beaglebone black.. so a > generic compiler is more than enough to build a os for beaglebone black. > i'm have bit confusion with these compiler's.are these are different from > one another..if so which one is the best suit for creating os for > beaglebone black. > > > thanks& > regards > siva > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
