Thanks for your answer. And is there any special reason for powering VBAT with 4.2V instead of 3.6V?
(I am asking this because I designed a board with the BeagleBoard schematics, and after 1 hour working (configuring linux on it through UART), the board stopped responding, the VDD1 dc/dc got broken and now it gives 2.6V to the OMAP instead of the 1.3V. I was powering VBAT with 3.6V Thank you. El viernes, 18 de abril de 2014 21:57:32 UTC+2, Gerald escribió: > > The 4.2 value is correct. That is the way I designed it. 3.6V is a typical > value. > > Gerald > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:37 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I am checking the voltage value of VBAT and I found that it should be >> 4.2V according to the image VBAT1.png attached here (obtained from the SRM >> of the Beagleboard). >> >> The problem is that I checked the TPS65950 datasheet and I found that the >> nominal value for VBAT is 3.6V, according to the images VBAT2.png and >> VBAT3.png attached here (obtained from the TPS65950 datasheet). >> >> Can someone clarify me this? >> >> thanks in advance. >> >> Andrés Cecilia Luque >> >> -- >> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BeagleBoard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
