Can anyone explain how/why the dtc specification of memory size is not being used, and/or where the actual size is coming from?
On Friday, April 25, 2014 10:02:40 PM UTC-7, ags wrote: > > Not necessarily an issue. Originally I was wondering if only half of > available physical memory was being made available. Still, I'd like to > understand why the device tree bindings indicate 256 MB memory, yet it > appears that the full 512 MB are available. > > >> -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
