Just an aside, there are plenty of 'ICs' on the market that are validated
for -40 to +125C, or even -40 to +150C.

So not entirely sure where that comment is coming from.

Jonathan Smith


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Maxim Podbereznyy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> So from the article "The BlueSteel-Basic is available for pre-order now at
> $55" and the full version is $55 at Digikey. What's the point? :)
> Moreover does removing a couple of chips make this board industrial
> friendly?
>
> "The IT version offers an industrial temperature range of -40 to 100°C" -
> who wrote this bullshit? There aren't any ICs at the market that can accept
> such temperature :)
>
> This COM is a BBB clone and really tested and qualified for industrial
> applications!
> http://www.mentorel.com/product/usomiq-am335x/
>
>
>
> 2014-06-18 9:19 GMT+04:00 William Hermans <[email protected]>:
>
> From what I could gather from the article, these are embest ./ element14
>> boards. Kind of hard to read through as one part of the article seems like
>> it's implying one thing, where in another it seems to go another direction.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:16 PM, John Syn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  From: William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 at 9:17 PM
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] BeagleBoard SBC Goes OEM, COM Version Coming
>>>
>>> Funny how these articles always seem to report stuff that's either
>>> incorrect or not entirely accurate.
>>>
>>> I think the overlying information given by the site is nice to know (
>>> such as new hardware being released ), but their actual write-ups are
>>> nothing more than FUD. The article you linked to had several points of
>>> misinformation, such as the BBB's processor speed ( but somehow they
>>> managed to get it right in the table of board differences ).
>>>
>>> Anyway, the board sound interesting, but personally I think they went
>>> the wrong direction in removing the eMMC. and am pretty sure it can be
>>> disabled via device tree overlays if additional IO's are needed ( which
>>> really wont give you many back anyway.).HDMI on the other hand, I'd never
>>> miss.
>>>
>>> Looks like the same board as the BBB with the eMMC and HDMI chips not
>>> populated. I’m sure Gerald & circuitco have analyzed the market requirement
>>> and this is what the market wants. If you have the numbers, I’m sure they
>>> will manufacture a batch with the eMMC populated or you could always add it
>>> yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Don't even get me started with "Angstrom is prefered by most / more
>>> professional developers . . ." Because that is plain B.S.  Also the
>>> statement "Moving to the more user friendly Debian
>>>  . . ." Is fairly hilarious. Mainly because many long time users of
>>> other distro's seem to have a hard time grasping the concepts of a more
>>> traditional Linux distro like Debian. For the record though this statement
>>> is accurate as Debian actually has real / proper documentation. Where
>>> Angstrom falls flat on its face
>>>
>>> I could go on, and on, but the fact is that "real professionals" are
>>> going  to use what makes the most sense for their project. If they want
>>> small, Angstrom is probably the last thing in their minds. QNX, or Busybox
>>> on a microkernel come to mind far ahead of anything else.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:44 PM, John Syn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linux.com/news/embedded-mobile/mobile-linux/777154-beaglebone-sbc-goes-oem-com-version-coming
>>>>
>>>> Interesting how we are the last to know about this!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>  --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/maximpodbereznyy
> Company - http://www.linkedin.com/company/mentorel
> Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/mentorel.company
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to