On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, pthor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just about to start up my second try at learning more embedded linux,
> and got myself a BBB. I'm somewhat unexperienced with embedded linux, but
> have done some stuff (and reading) earlier: building kernels, applied some
> patches, building Qt, tslib, gstreamer for angstrom. But I have some doubts
> now and hope that you may help me with some guidence with a few specific and
> some more general questions.
>
> My longterm goals is to set up a system where I can run newest Qt, support
> for display, audio and be able to play with driver and application
> development.
>
> Where I am:
> - I've done some research lately and it seems like I want a newer kernel
> (3.14 for example) with SGX fixes, (for Qt 5)
> - The only graphical application I want to run is my own custom one, so I
> feel that "non GUI" Angstrom distro fits better than the supplied Debian
> distro. But I'm a little clueless regarding the roofs.
> - Earlier I have relied on the distro provided with a development board, now
> I want better control and understanding.
>
> Is there any dependencies between the beaglebone 3.14 kernel and rootfs?
> Is it supposed to run with Debian rootfs only?

Really any current "rootfs" that can at-least run 2.6.32, will boot
fine with this 3.14.  The kernel config already includes all the
dependices for systemd by default. (I do need to re-add the Android
configs).  So, really, it should just work, if it doesn't just ping
this list and we will get that missing config enabled.

> Can use the Angstrom build tool(or other method) to build a Angstrom rootfs
> and use the beaglebone 3.14 kernel "out of the box"?
> Is there any version dependencies in the rootfs that I need to worry about?
> Is there any benefit to look into yocto for me? It seems a bit overwhelming
> for me, at least now.
>
> (With beaglebone 3.14 kernel i mean the kernel discussed in: BeagleBone
> Black switching to 3.14 kernel )
>
> I dont understand all the details yet, but is all the beaglebone specific
> driver/cape/dts stuff provided with the kernel? Or is there some BSP stuff I
> need to provide in the rootfs? BSP is per definition a part of the kernel?

Any tool not found in a current distro, can be found at:

https://github.com/beagleboard/

> I have some books on device drivers and embedded linux from 2.6 kernel era.
> Is these books still relevant with 3.x kernels? Do you have some keywords
> regarding important topics that have changed? I guess Device tree is one.

Device Tree should be in the books from 2.6 kernel, back then it was
mostly a powerpc thing. It wasn't till late in the 2.6.xx/ early 3.x
series did device tree's become "bootable" and till 3.10.x when it
became "very*" useful. (* multarch became useful, imx+omap same
kernel)

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to