Hi Is it possible to maintain an experimental branch having CONFIG_PREEMPT ? Considering profiling shared by Víctor and the kind of projects people use BBB for ...
On Friday, September 19, 2014 2:13:21 AM UTC+5:30, Víctor MV wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Thanks Jason for pointing out this thread. Let me share with you our > conclusions through BeaglePilot: > > - We tested vanilla, PREEMPT, RT_PREEMPT and Xenomai several times and > our results indicated that the best performing one is actually the PREEMPT > kernel (not the RT_PREEMPT as one would expect). > - We had some issues with the capemgr while working with the > RT_PREEMPT (*not* with *PREEMPT*) patches but once we updated the > patches (available here <https://github.com/bugobliterator/kernel>) we > made it work with RT_PREEMPT as well. > - At the time our flying systems are running a PREEMPT Debian. > > According to our benchmarking my recommendation will be to use PREEMPT > because it's quite easy to activate/mantain. > > I'd be happy to attend any questions on this matter. This post > <http://erlerobot.com/blog/beaglepilot-cyclictests-different-kernels/> > could be of some interest for some of you. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
