On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:23 AM, anupsingh chandel <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Jason,
This thread has been dead for 4 years and should have been dead for 6. Do NOT hijack threads with irrelevant posts. > > Thank you for all the documents and such an amazing product. I want to use > BBB in my design as an LCD driver and USB host. Can I use it..? Can you? > But i don't > need other componets on the PCB apart from my requirement. Can I develop PCB > using the gerber provided? People do it all the time. > will there be any intellactual property rights > violation? The only intellectual property rights violated are those of our common sense of politeness when it comes to sending messages to a public list. See http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack#Terms_of_Use > > Please let me know. > > Thank & regards, > Anup. > > > On Saturday, July 26, 2008 5:32:53 PM UTC+5:30, Jason Kridner wrote: >> >> Andrew and all, >> >> The one thing I was hoping to have in place before sharing schematic and >> PCB layout files was to have a really good engagement plan. By engagement >> plan, I essentially mean the definition of the Beagle Board project goals >> and what type of business arrangements we'd entertain, such as endorsing the >> sale of cases, including certain features, or turning over manufacturing. >> Instead of waiting for these things to be perfectly clear, however, I'd like >> to just get the thoughts out there for some dialog. >> >> All Beagle Board peripherals and side products are welcome, as are >> "competing" projects that make use of the design. The goal of Beagle is to >> illustrate the capability of the OMAP3530 device at a cost point where most >> interested people can experience it. Beagle is meant to get those who are >> interested in OMAP to work in the open, enabling us all to get along a bit >> faster or further in our designs. Beagle is not meant to be a substitute >> for the system-on-module offerings that are tremendously beneficial to >> getting a product to market quickly, without a lot of up-front costs, but >> instead more for software developers, students, and hobbyists who don't plan >> on making more than one of their hardware setup. >> >> If someone wants to put a case around Beagle and call it a product, great. >> To be successful selling that product, they would need to add some value, >> such as a particular set of bundled software, additional peripherals, or >> some cost reduction. We don't want to be in the business of controlling >> this market. There are some really great manufacturers out there that >> understand the needs of community developers, system developers, and end >> consumers. We'd like to avoid disrupting their business plans by setting >> any misleading expectations. Now that Beagle is being broadly announced, it >> seems best to keep any product or manufacturing discussion out in the open. >> It is understood that this isn't something many people are comfortable >> with--to a great extent because it requires talking about things that you >> might not ever deliver, thus hurting your brand and reputation. While this >> is a dangerous reality, getting real community feedback on your plans is >> also good--and we really don't want to *OWN* Beagle. Our only concerns are >> that no one does it harm and that can be assured by making sure that plans >> for Beagle are discussed openly. Harm to Beagle is defined as something >> that would prevent those interested from being able to get/afford one, but >> making a better product than Beagle is in no way considered harmful. Beagle >> is intentionally incomplete, yet still flexible enough to enable >> exploration. >> >> Editing the website is welcome. This is a tough one for many people to >> swallow, but at least I am confident that this is a self-policing activity. >> I would have been quite happy if Bridge Worldwide would have added features >> to the website and then advertised the fact that they did so (they are a >> nice group of talented people). Perhaps that is a bit easier to appreciate >> than the idea that I'm fine with people editing the website to add >> essentially advertisements for their OMAP3-based designs, services, and >> products. I see that as a benefit to the community. I also think that this >> particular community is sufficiently active to recognize insincere behavior >> that would result in more bad press than good. Do what you can and take >> credit for it, but nothing more. There's nothing wrong with that. (Web >> content edits are desired to be git patches sent to this mailing list, >> similar to the Linux kernel patches.) >> >> Further, it is fully expected that for someone designing their own system >> they would purchase the OMAP35x EVM (http://www.ti.com/omap35x) and utilize >> the hardware expansion options and documented support channels. Developing >> a board is a complex task that will cost you thousands of $US. The EVM is >> still quite reasonably priced for developers interested in building their >> own hardware. >> >> BeagleBoard.org would obviously not handle returns and repairs for boards >> not manufactured under Gerald's supervision (or delegated supervision). >> >> All this said, here you go.... >> >> These design materials are *NOT SUPPORTED* and DO NOT constitute a >> reference design. Only "community" support is allowed via resources at >> BeagleBoard.org/discuss. >> >> THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE DESIGN MATERIALS, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED >> BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE >> COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" >> WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, >> BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND >> FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY >> AND PERFORMANCE OF THE DESIGN MATERIALS IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE >> PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY >> SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. >> >> We mean it, these materials may be totally unsuitable for any purposes. >> >> http://beagleboard.org/hardware/design >> >> Please let us know what luck you have in shopping for PCB makers and >> assemblers utilizing these materials. >> >> Thanks and best of luck, >> Jason >> On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Gerald Coley wrote: >> >> When available, it will be provided "as is" in the following formats: >> >> >> >> Schematic...... PDF and OrCAD >> PCB...............Gerbers and Allegro. >> >> >> >> Gerald >> >> >> On 7/24/08, opensource Aung <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> is it available to get orcad format ? >>> >>> 2008/7/24, Dirk Behme <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> >>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>> > I would like to know the publish date of beagleboard schematic and >>>> > pcb layout in electronic form too. >>>> >>>> Do you know >>>> >>>> http://elinux.org/BeagleBoard#Schematic >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>>> Dirk >>>> >>>> > On 7月24日, 上午4時14分, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>Hi Jason, >>>> >> >>>> >>Thanks for the info. >>>> >> >>>> >>We love the concept of the beagleboard and hope to use it as the basis >>>> >>for a custom design. However the 0.4mm pitch OMAP35x with PoP is state >>>> >>of art in terms of PCB design, manufacture and assembly. >>>> >> >>>> >>We are looking to find a PCB maker and PCB assembler that can >>>> >>manufacture a custom design prefereably from the UK. >>>> >> >>>> >>When are you likely to publish the beagleboard schematic and pcb >>>> >>layout in electronic form? >>>> >> >>>> >>Regards, >>>> >> >>>> >>Andrew. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
