Hi Karl, The PRU GAS and LD ports should be in a good shape. But the PRU GCC port has not yet reached beta. Judge for yourself:
- PRU GCC has not been "battle tested" on a big project. - Only two small examples are currently used to "sanity check" the pru gcc releases. - PRU GCC has no known bugs. If you can take a little risk and don't mind checking the compiler-generated assembler, then go ahead and try PRU GCC. If you want an "ASAP, no hassles" C compiler for PRU, TI's one would be a more suitable choice right now. Regards, Dimitar On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 2:11:23 PM UTC+2, Karl Karpfen wrote: > > Hi, > > it seems there are two C-compilers available that are able to generate > PRU-code. One from TI and one introduced here in this board. But...which > one is recommended to be used? That's what I found out so far, may be > somebody can add some missing information to make it easier to choose one: > > TI's PRU-C-compiler is > > - available at > http://software-dl.ti.com/codegen/non-esd/downloads/beta.htm > - BETA > - can be used to create ARM-objects (which can be linked to a bare metal > application and loaded to PRU on start-up automatically?) > > Community/Open Source PRU-C-compiler is > > - avaialble at https://github.com/dinuxbg/gnupru > - BETA > - GCC-based and therefore more stable > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
