On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:51 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
> *I wonder if the deal with the ip, is we just don not have UHS-I/UHS-II >> support..* >> >> * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#Ultra_High_Speed_bus >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#Ultra_High_Speed_bus>* >> >> * On a side note, none of my usb-sdhc adapters can read my SanDisk sdxc* >> * card without a kernel opps on x86, (v3.18-rc5) so i can't test till i* >> * get back to work.* > > > I was wondering about this the other night. Not the specifics, as I pretty > much know nothing about the low level standards of each implementation. But > the idea that similar hardware can be enabled or disabled in software. Thus > making for an easy "hack" to get more features by paying less. > > This sort of thing has after all been done before. . . > Plus, we were assuming "SanDisk" just threw out their old "controller" and did the SDXC implementation by scratch. They probably just saved the man hours and bolted the SDXC support on the older "controller".. But i wonder how they are donig the >32GB limitation of SDHC... if only the SDHC/SDXC spec was open! ;) Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
