On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:38 PM, John Syn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, "Robert Nelson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>> Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed? >>> >>> Have some fantastic news on the Ubuntu front. Various OpenJDK 8 >>>packages via >>> an unofficial PPA are available for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) and 14.04 >>> (Trusty). >> >>So it only took 38 hours 19 minutes. ;) > So the Quad CortexA9 took 5 days (120 hours) and the OMAP5 took 38 hours > which is more then 3X performance. My bet is the build was running all > CPUs close to 100% for the entire build so this would be a good comparison.
So over thanksgiving i let my quad wand do the same task: omap5_uevm: (i was also building cloud9 during week, let's say 95% of the time was openjdk) Build needed 38:19:47, 6215244k disc space wand quad: (i was out of state while this was running, so 100% core usage..) Build needed 50:06:26, 6215460k disc space The dual a15's come out to 30% faster then the quad a9's... Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
