On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Charles Steinkuehler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/8/2014 10:52 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Charles Steinkuehler >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> <fingers crossed this actually works out!> >> >> There's only a couple conflicts. ;) >> > <snip> >> >> I'll cutt a raw diff and use that for a branch >> "ti-linux-xenomai-3.14.y" on >> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev > > With any luck, they're as simple as the 3.8.13 conflict (one patch > didn't apply because some #include lines were removed at the top of the > file). I crafted a pre/post patch set to keep the Xenomai kernel patch > script happy and haven't had to mess with it since. > > With the -ti kernel being mostly mainline (closer to mainline than the > 3.8.13 kernel probably), it hopefully won't take too much massaging. > Let me know if I can help.
First pass pushed: https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/commit/213ddbfb8b35e7e926d7f9c44ba5b0178aa8d5a2 It's still building here, most of the conflicts where in x86, so i cheated and just disabled ipipe on x86 and ignored those. There was one irq change on omap-gpio (this is where ti changed it a lot) so that "might" not work... Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
