On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 20:08 -0500, Philip Polstra wrote: > I remember populating this info for my XBee Cape, only to find that it > is not used at all. I think it is still a good idea to have the info > in there in case it is really used in the future. In theory it should > be possible to have the cape configured without the need for a DTB > file for each cape.
The data in there is useful and I can think of some other useful data, like a link to the elinux site. But if I put my manufacturer hat on, I want to know what's required and what's recommended. For example, the CryptoCape doesn't populate the week the board was made [1]. SparkFun uses it's own system AFIAK. I think that the EEPROM Spec, as written, doesn't match current practice. Nice-to-haves are nice-to-have, but it would be nice if that was indicated in the spec. ;) Josh [1] This is a result of my recommendation, so feel free to blame me, not SparkFun on this one. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
