A lot depends on SW as well. Best way to pass is to put it in a box, but
thee are some other things you can try that involve $$.

You can contact me directly and we can have a lively discussion about your
issues.

Gerald


On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Mash <[email protected]> wrote:

> Good Afternoon,
>
> First off, thanks to the BB community for making this such a great
> resource for those working on the BBB and other boards. I have personally
> spent hours on this forum.
>
> I am hoping that someone monitoring this group may be able to help me and
> my company solve an EMC problem that we are facing the the BBB. *We are
> open to paid consultations to aid in solving this issue (Gerald?)*. We
> are building a product around the BBB that needs to pass FCC part 15 Class
> B. We are having trouble passing the tests mostly around the 625 MHz range.
> We were only 1-2dB above the limit in one lab and almost 10dB over at
> another lab (yes, test equipment makes a big difference!). We tried it with
> and without our custom shield attached.
>
> There is another thread here:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/beagleboard/625/beagleboard/Y6BhtzKx2oY/YQ_xjmmkWusJ
> that seems to have the same problem. That thread seems to have lost
> attention of the key players in this group so I thought I would create
> another thread to bring more attention to this critical issue.
>
> We have done some pretty aggressive modifications to the board and the
> only way we can get the board to pass is by completely disabling (and
> depowering) the LAN PHY. This was accomplished by removing FB4 and mangling
> part of the device tree so we don't get a kernel panic on startup. Not an
> elegant solution, I know.
>
> As suggested in the other similar thread, we tried shorting R136 but it
> actually made the noise worse.
>
> We also tried disabling (removing Y4) the McASP oscillator as that was
> also generating quite a bit of noise. Didn't help enough.
>
> Has anyone other than CircuitCo been able to successfully pass FCC with
> the BBBw/Ethernet enabled as part of a system? CircuitCo was probably able
> to pass because they could isolate the BBB with big filters on all cables
> because they aren't selling the BBB as as system but as a component.
> Because ours is a "Commercial System", we need to test with all cables as
> they would be typically installed. No giant chokes for us.
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon
>
>
>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Gerald

[email protected]
http://beagleboard.org/
http://circuitco.com/support/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to