The only quad core I've noticed on TI's site lately is an A15 quad (
keystone ) and is $125 @ 1ku . . . No stock, but active.

Anyway, the dual A15 on the X15 is supposed to be more than a match for the
quad on the rPI 2.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 4:14 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can sit and think about tons of reasons why the beaglebone line is
> heads( and tails ) above the rest. But the two most prominent in my own
> mind . . .
>
> 1) It is a real embedded system unlike most ( all? ) "comparable" boards
> out there. Plenty ways to interface the board to the outside world, and TI
> is the only ARM licensee who has PRUs one die( or otherwise ) that I'm
> aware of.
>
> 2) A real Linux distribution that is well documented. Not some fork of a
> real distro, or some made up crappy distro because no one felt like
> supporting a dated instruction set. This means "we" have the whole Linux
> open source community to work with. Instead of having to perform secrete
> handshakes, or special incantations / magic hand waving every time the
> kernel changes.
>
> the rPI 2 should be inline with #2 above, but we'll see how well their BSP
> shapes up. After that though. They're using the same old GPU . . .
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi William.
>>
>> I'm a big fan of the bbb. I like its wide range of io, the headers that
>> make it stable when mounted on a cape and its price point. It also uses a
>> CPU that I could put into my own design, unlike the Broadcom soc on the pi2
>> that I guess you need some magic handshake and millions of units to get
>> access to.
>>
>> I see the x15 aimed at a different market due to cost and features.
>> That's a good question though. Who is the x15 intended for? Why choose the
>> x15 over say a minnowboard max?
>>
>> I'd like to help keep the bbb more on par with the cpu power of the pi2.
>> Basically a bbb v2 with a multi core cpu, and maybe 1gb of ram as its
>> leading features at a similar price point. I'm not sure if TI has any
>> sitara quad cores in the works that might be candidates.
>>
>> I've done some digital circuit design, board bring up, uboot, etc. I'd
>> be willing to help in any effort if circuitco, Gerald etc were interested.
>> Plus the company I work for is using the bbb in a design and we could
>> benefit from another CPU or three.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, April 25, 2015, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There are boards out there with SATA on them that cost less than the BBB
>>> does right now. That are around the same size.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2/open-source-hardware
>>>
>>> That is one. Robert even has build instructions for it . . . but drivers
>>> still seemed to be in infancy last i looked.
>>>
>>> Anyway Chris you should be more precise on what you want. If you want
>>> any serious feedback. Which crowd do you think benefits from using a BBB
>>> but not the X15 ? Are we talking pure cost, or something else ? Granted,
>>> I'm also expecting the cost of the X15 to be out of the casual hobbyist
>>> range. Which may have been by design ?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Graham.
>>>>
>>>> I've been watching the x15 project. It doesn't look like the same kind
>>>> of board for the same kind of end user imo. eSATA isn't something we'd
>>>> use (we are ok with sd or emmc for these limited uses), audio codec is
>>>> interesting but wonder if that also increases cost for people that
>>>> don't need it, same with the expansion connector, 2GB of ram vs. 1GB
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> I think a BBB v2 would be a lower performance/capability point than
>>>> say the x15, something more price/performance in line with the Pi2
>>>> than a minnowboard.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> > http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoard-X15
>>>> >
>>>> > ==
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> > ---
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> > "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an
>>>> > email to [email protected].
>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>  --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to