On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:57 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > William, thanks for all the info. Good to know Robert is "The Man". I will > try working though the link to his stuff. > > Re my comment about kernel.org - I am unfamiliar with the behind-the-scenes > operation, but from what I observe > the source from kernel.org supports many arm processors and boards. At some > point a new board comes along and > people start with the tree from kernel.org and make changes in their own > separate tree to support the new board. > Later these changes are merged into a new version that is available from > kernel.org, which I was calling "official" > for lack of a better term. > > Anyway... setting aside my poor terminology... is is not clear to me when > kernel.org becomes the best place to grab from. > It sounds like for the BBB it is not. i.e. Roberts stuff is best.
mainline kernel.org runs fine.. It's just a lot of advanced things like the pru still need some work.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
