Nice answer. In your opinion, which is the efficient language to use with beaglebone?* Can we use Java or NodeJS?* In one of our projects,* we planned to use beaglebone to be highly multitasking with a lot of sensors and internet connectivity.* *What is your choice of language that we should use?*
*(C/C++/JAVA/PHP/Node.Js/Python)* On Friday, 22 June 2012 01:58:46 UTC+5:30, Sid Boyce wrote: > > If you can get to run "top" it'll show you how much CPU and memory python > is using. > Memory may not be a problem but no doubt CPU usage will be high. > Regards > Sid. > > On 21/06/12 21:01, Amadeus Bachmann wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. CPU usage was not something I have taken into > consideration. However from now on I will think more about it. Thanks again! > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Sid Boyce <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On 21/06/12 15:42, zero wrote: >> >>> Hello there, >>> >>> I am using a RFID module attached to my beaglebone with UART1, reading >>> ID Tags and printing the tags to the LED. Everything is OK up to this >>> point. My question is the continuing: when I execute the python code, I >>> cannot do anything else with my beaglebone. Because it keeps executing >>> until I stop it. What I want is kind of a interrupt structure. What I mean >>> is: when I execute the python code, it will be working at the background >>> and when it reads a RFID card (an interrupt will occur) it will print the >>> ID to the screen and then program will continue running at the background. >>> >>> I do not have an idea how to do it. Could you please help me? >>> >> >> As python is an interpreted language it runs very slowly, uses up lots of >> resources on Beagleboard and I'm sure it's the same on the BeagleBone. >> >> I have an application with some C code and mostly python, it runs with >> pauses between outputting sound on the -XM to the point where speech is >> heard in one second intermittent bursts. >> >> The same program run on an x86_64 uses ~40% CPU while another program >> written in C to do exactly the same thing runs at < 3% CPU. >> Regards >> Sid. >> >> -- >> Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot >> Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support >> Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach >> Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks >> >> >> -- To join: http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: >> [email protected] <javascript:> >> Frequently asked questions: http://beagleboard.org/faq >> > > -- To join: http://beagleboard.org/discuss > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: > [email protected] <javascript:> > Frequently asked questions: http://beagleboard.org/faq > > > > -- > Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot > Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support > Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach > Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
