On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 12:43:22 AM UTC, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:45:00 -0800 (PST), Richard Markham > <[email protected] <javascript:>> declaimed the > following: > > > >xrandr is giving me an error saying that it cannot get gamma and it's set > >to 0:0:0. I assume this is a clue as to why the display image appears to > be > >a stretched resolution, it's almost unreadable. > > > Gamma normally refers to how brighness curves are implemented to > map > linear color space to phosphor response. Not anything related to > resolution. > > > >Screen 0: minimum 1920 x 1080, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080 > >default connected 1920x1080+0+0 (0x102) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm > > I'd consider that 0mm to be significant... > > > 1920x1080 (0x102) 0.0MHz *current > > h: width 1920 start 0 end 0 total 1920 skew 0 clock > >0.0KHz > > v: height 1080 start 0 end 0 total 1080 clock > >0.0Hz > > > Similar to those scan rates of 0.0... > > -- > Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN > [email protected] <javascript:> HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/ > > So what's causing the discrepancy between what the EDID is saying and what xrandr is saying?
-- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
