I know this has been discussed and I understand TI's POV. I apologize if I seemed pushy or something. That is not my intention. It's just that I currently see data coming from my BBB that seems reasonable, although slightly offset. There seems to be a nice correlation with changes in room-temperature too. Anyway, it was just me wondering. Never mind. I'll retire my code.
Thanks for the answer. Really appreciating your effort. On Saturday, 19 December 2015 20:22:43 UTC+1, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Maurice H. <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > I did. Thanks. > > > > Any chance this could be implemented by a third-party? Or is the TI-code > a > > proprietary blob? > > Yeah, it's easy to fix: > > sudo ln -s /dev/urandom /sys/class/hwmon/temp_sensor > > okay so it's not "that" bad.. But /dev/urandom is more 'consistent'... > > But bad enough, TI hardware engineers told TI kernel developers to not > bother pushing it upstream. > > This has been discussed previously on this list.. > > Regards, > > -- > Robert Nelson > https://rcn-ee.com/ > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
