remoteproc definitely has some bad behavior. But what I am doing is just as experimental, and no motors (all data transfer) involved.
What is currently considered a reliable methodology for getting the most out of the PRUs? Also, what about C versus assembler? Will C alone suffice, or is there real need to do some assembler? I've found that there are actually two different assemblers, the older pasm (apparently no longer supported), and the assembler part of clpru. If you are just starting out in PRU work, should pasm even be considered? Regards, Greg On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 4:49:49 PM UTC-5, William Hermans wrote: > > I would recommend staying away from remoteproc and rpmsg at least until > it's out of experimental. > > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
