> Robert, are you saying that read/write with a Sandisk uSD[XH]C Pro would be > faster than the eMMC? How about the Sandisk uSD[XH]C Ultra Plus?
SanDisk Ultra SDHC root@beaglebone:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing cached reads: 436 MB in 2.00 seconds = 217.65 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 62 MB in 3.07 seconds = 20.21 MB/sec BBG: Micron eMMC root@beaglebone:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk1 /dev/mmcblk1: Timing cached reads: 442 MB in 2.01 seconds = 220.37 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 102 MB in 3.00 seconds = 33.96 MB/sec > And another question: I'm curious as to why your BBB images are set up as a > single partition as opposed to having a separate FAT16 boot partition which > it seems used to be the norm? There is no good reason to have that legacy partition. bootloader -> mbr u-boot can read extX, so the kernel files are in the rootfs the beagleboard doc's are in an apt package that can be updated.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
