On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Jason Kridner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 2:05:47 PM UTC-5, Brian Anderson wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> Drop dnsmasq/create_ap, add back udhcpd >>> >> >> Just curious, why udhcpd rather than dnsmasq? Isn't dnsmasq supposed to >> be "light weight"? Err, lighter than udhcpd? What is the difference >> between the two? >> > > Robert, what was the reason here? It would be great if we could reduce the > number of tools and simply do bug fixes ourselves to try to push things > across the finish line. Right now, I'm in networking hell. :-( > So dnsmasq was creating havok on usb0. Connman tethering worked cleanly on both usb0 & wlan0.. BUT, connman wouldn't allow us to use "192.168.7.x" for usb0, there is no config option to specify ip address ranges. I didn't want to break all the docs that said to connect over "192.168.7.2".. Thus connman was used for wlan0 and usb0 for udhcpd.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYgyFWpf1xSRSAPJbEGzrjK7EsundaOiMdQSvD4uSsuZtg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
