Hi Antoine The "bone" images are basically patched version of torvalds' linux tree, while the 'ti' version are based on TI's linux kernel. So basically the -ti- kernel is based on https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev and -bone- are based on https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel
and yes, those -rt- images are with RT_PREEMPT patch. Further, this might be helpful : https://eewiki.net/display/linuxonarm/BeagleBone+Black On Friday, 3 June 2016 17:37:15 UTC+5:30, Antoine Rennuit wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Does anyone know the difference between the Robert C. Nelson kernels > tagged *"ti"* and the ones tagged *"bone"*? At some point there was a > difference in the PRU handling (*"bone"* was using the old *uio_pruss* > and *"ti"* the new *remoteproc_pruss*) but are there other differences? > > Also, for the kernels being tagged *"rt"*, they are compiled with > *RT_PREEMPT*, right? It is not a xenomai patch being setup? > > Kind regards, > > Antoine. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/f22e03d1-4de9-4816-a4c3-9f77786d761f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
