*grep comes back empty,  implies dtbo has no effect?*   Can someone please 
post a working PRU Pin P9.27  dts config with confirmation out put like 
below?

I am trying to build one that uses the *compatible = "bone-pinmux-helper"* 
target atm to see if that makes a difference. syntax errors....

Neil

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:29:38 PM UTC-7, William Hermans wrote:
>
> Something like  this, but replace grep pwm with grep pru:
>
> root@beaglebone:/home/william# *cat 
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/44e10800.pinmux/pinmux-pins |grep pwm*
> pin 8 (44e10820.0): ocp:P8_19_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P8_19_pwm_pin group pinmux_P8_19_pwm_pin
> pin 9 (44e10824.0): ocp:P8_13_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P8_13_pwm_pin group pinmux_P8_13_pwm_pin
> pin 18 (44e10848.0): ocp:P9_14_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P9_14_pwm_pin group pinmux_P9_14_pwm_pin
> pin 19 (44e1084c.0): ocp:P9_16_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P9_16_pwm_pin group pinmux_P9_16_pwm_pin
> pin 84 (44e10950.0): ocp:P9_22_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P9_22_pwm_pin group pinmux_P9_22_pwm_pin
> pin 85 (44e10954.0): ocp:P9_21_pinmux (GPIO UNCLAIMED) function 
> pinmux_P9_21_pwm_pin group pinmux_P9_21_pwm_pin
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Neil Jubinville <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know how to verify a pinmux config is truly in place?  
>>
>> I am trying to set 0x1A4 mode 5   0x05 .  The dts compiles and loads but 
>> I have a feeling it is not taking.
>>
>> Is there a static file somewhere that holds the pru pin configs in the 
>> current state?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>> On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:05:53 PM UTC-7, William Hermans wrote:
>>>
>>> It's also described here: 
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/beagleboard/Robert$20Nelson$20remoteproc|sort:date/beagleboard/LOaTgWH7Tpo/T0eote3TAQAJ
>>>  
>>> in John's first post. Which was from Roberts original "how to" post several 
>>> months back it seems.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:03 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, Gregs' working kernel is from before this change. So only had 
>>>> remoteproc ability. Where these new kernels have the ability to enable 
>>>> either / or.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Neil Jubinville <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Look up in this thread to Robert's post I believe both are disabled.  
>>>>> You have to choose one and enable it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 5:52:59 PM UTC-7, William Hermans wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Greg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't adjust anything in the device tree.  I never had to do that 
>>>>>>> before to successfully run the Remoteproc examples.  The only thing I 
>>>>>>> have 
>>>>>>> ever had to tweak is the pull-up/down resistors in the pads.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I run lsmod, I am seeing normal Remoteproc drivers after 
>>>>>>> modprobe commands, except for the rpmsg driver which is not getting 
>>>>>>> inserted when I think it should.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would think there is at least some element of the device tree 
>>>>>>> entries in /sys which are independent of loadable kernel modules?
>>>>>>> I'm trying to understand the approach to debug this type of problem.
>>>>>>> I think I need to verify solid device tree entries for the PRUs and 
>>>>>>> go from there.  ???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>> So a while back, in one of the board overlay, or regular overlays, 
>>>>>> maybe one of the includes( I forget which ) Robert had comments, and 
>>>>>> commented out code for enabling UIO, or remoteproc in the latest TI 
>>>>>> kernels. I'm not sure if the newer version of these files have the 
>>>>>> remoteproc includes commented out or not. So what I'm saying here may 
>>>>>> not 
>>>>>> apply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me search the groups here and find what I'm thinking of.
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/58a346dc-09ce-4e54-aa2b-ac48f52275aa%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/58a346dc-09ce-4e54-aa2b-ac48f52275aa%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/462d6573-2c1d-4856-ab73-a867686b9084%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/462d6573-2c1d-4856-ab73-a867686b9084%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/c907c710-189c-4df6-8958-674087a0cf9c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to