On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Robert.
> I understand that you're the main maintainer of this kernel, so I'm sure
> there are plenty of demands on your time - therefore I appreciate you taking
> the time to reply.
> I'm not sure that I follow exactly what you mean, but I'll do the relevant
> background reading and try the things you've suggested.
>
> If any other uses would like to share their experience/advice regarding
> building 4.4 series kernels on the Beaglebone Black then I'd be interested
> to hear.

So some of the background.  With the "linux-header" package in v4.4.x,
arm is still really a 2nd class arch next to x86.  As not everything
get's fully (correctly) generated in the header package.  Some of this
is still related to the device-tree and multi-arch changeover.  With
mainline (v4.13.0-rc5) things are getting better on every major
release.  (v4.4.x is better then v4.1.x/v3.14.x)

So what i recommend users do, first install "linux-headers-`uname -r`"
and try building your module.  It should work in simplistic cases,
however if it fails, you'll need the full kernel source to do your
module build. (in which case the yakbuild scripts are the easiest way
to grab any release)..

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYiJewg0zx314ZtUqNV%3DZ%2BXVnCwqx8fpaazo5-XbZJYvYA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to