So i'm working on adding support for a few Overlays (taking advantage
of the CLICK interface)..

What do you guys think of this naming:

Option A/B: (there's no A or B on the board)

PB-A-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo
PB-B-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo

Use the interface names:

PB-U4-I2C1-SPI0-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo
PB-U2-I2C2-SPI1-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo

Option U/M (aka U=USB, M=MicroSD) because Click "fits" over that...

PB-U-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo
PB-M-RTC-6-CLICK-00A0.dtbo

I personally like the U/M option.. as it the easiest to explain to new
users (or is it?).

Thoughs???

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYiwi9xsQbUCLnGpuOxANnc5Y2X3L851np%3DxNdq7nUPTGg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to