On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:00 PM, 'Luther Goh Lu Feng' via BeagleBoard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am assuming the answer is yes based on what was discussed in this > thread[1]. > > Next question. If I flash the eMMC using the microSD card debian flasher > script, and then dd out 1MB from the eMMC and microSD, do I expect both to > have the same shasum? I expect yes, since they came from the same debian > image, but unless I made a mistake or there are some false assumptions on my > part, I seemed to be getting different checksums
No... different drive geometries.. > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/beagleboard/mlo$20microsd|sort:relevance/beagleboard/8fe5054qZss/xVX8hSPa7OoJ > On Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 4:03:47 PM GMT+8, Luther Goh Lu Feng > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand that in the default boot priority, which is the eMMC followed > by the microSD, the MLO and u-boot resides in the eMMC.In the case where the > eMMC does not contain a valid boot image, the microSD gets booted. > > Question: does a bootable microSD contain a copy of the MLO and uboot? Yes.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYg8uYODC%2Bs9QfhJXmU4Etr95o4ig4h0nEAdaMP0CCWAGA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
