On 11/02/18 11:43, Graham wrote: > I am not an expert at Device Tree stuff, but this is what I think I know. > I2C-0 is intended for internal board management, so sort of reserved, > except as a last resort. > I2C-1 is available, but not enabled, on the BBB and is > enabled/implemented on the PocketBeagle, so you could always look at the > PocketBeagle implementation.
I figure then, if we want to hook our own stuff up, then I²C1 is the preferred port to use? In my case I'm running a PocketBeagle, and while I've hooked up headers to I²C0, I haven't yet exposed those. -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/84e8df94-7cfc-e50c-d188-b9507631cdb9%40longlandclan.id.au. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
