On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:08 PM maxmike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Rebooted and swapped routers (only one has the new network on it).
>
> I'm getting the feeling that Debian lost control here and needs connman. But
> I can't upgrade, so now I have to change
> horses in midstream because the old images can't support a netmask other than
> /24; not a problem if you are fooling
> around in the lab, but once you have installed embedded systems in the field
> ... geez this sort of thing burns me up.
I run a /22 network (at home... Don't ask, but it's related to testing. ;) )
[ip addr show eth0]
4: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,DYNAMIC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 84:eb:18:e2:52:9a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.3.201/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::86eb:18ff:fee2:529a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Connman + Debian 10 (v4.14.x-ti, v4.19.x-ti, v5.4.x-ti, v4.14.x-bone,
v4.19.x-bone, and v5.4.x-bone kernel's..)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYjSoUOBEuz%2BAkf3s1u%3DsnK09M4AhNFEoE0niWksz4pcig%40mail.gmail.com.
