I'm re-running buildroot using ttyO0 instead of ttyS0 for getty (using 
ttyS0 solved a previous problem).

Here is the log from using ttyS0:


Initializing random number generator... done.

Starting network: ip: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

FAIL

Starting sshd: OK

[   22.933599] ttyS ttyS0: tty_port_close_start: tty->count = 1 port count 
= 2

[   22.941638]

[   22.941644] ======================================================

[   22.941648] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]

[   22.941650] 4.11.3 #1 Not tainted

[   22.941654] -------------------------------------------------------

[   22.941657] getty/118 is trying to acquire lock:

[   22.941660]  (&port_lock_key){-.-...}, at: [<c0565780>] 
serial_omap_console_write+0x124/0x164

[   22.941670]

[   22.941673] but task is already holding lock:

[   22.941675]  (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c0547460>] 
tty_port_close_start.part.0+0x1c/0x194

[   22.941684]

[   22.941687] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[   22.941689]

[   22.941691]

[   22.941695] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[   22.941696]

[   22.941698] -> #1 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-...}:

[   22.941708]        tty_port_tty_get+0x14/0x40

[   22.941711]        tty_port_default_wakeup+0x8/0x20

[   22.941714]        serial_omap_irq+0x324/0x3cc

[   22.941717]        __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x3b4

[   22.941720]        handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1c/0x58

[   22.941723]        handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c

[   22.941726]        handle_level_irq+0xc0/0x154

[   22.941728]        generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x34

[   22.941731]        __handle_domain_irq+0x64/0xe0

[   22.941734]        __irq_svc+0x70/0x98

[   22.941737]        _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44

[   22.941740]        uart_write+0xf4/0x188

[   22.941743]        n_tty_write+0x1b0/0x454

[   22.941745]        tty_write+0x174/0x2c0

[   22.941748]        __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114

[   22.941751]        vfs_write+0xa0/0x168

[   22.941753]        SyS_write+0x3c/0x90

[   22.941756]        ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c

[   22.941758]

[   22.941760] -> #0 (&port_lock_key){-.-...}:

[   22.941769]        _raw_spin_lock+0x28/0x38

[   22.941773]        serial_omap_console_write+0x124/0x164

[   22.941775]        console_unlock+0x290/0x52c

[   22.941778]        vprintk_emit+0x21c/0x2b0

[   22.941781]        vprintk_default+0x20/0x28

[   22.941784]        printk+0x20/0x30

[   22.941787]        tty_port_close_start.part.0+0x180/0x194

[   22.941789]        tty_port_close+0x28/0x64

[   22.941792]        tty_release+0xf0/0x494

[   22.941795]        __fput+0x84/0x1d4

[   22.941798]        task_work_run+0xc0/0xe4

[   22.941800]        do_work_pending+0xbc/0xc0

[   22.941803]        slow_work_pending+0xc/0x20

[   22.941805]

[   22.941808] other info that might help us debug this:

[   22.941810]

[   22.941813]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   22.941815]

[   22.941817]        CPU0                    CPU1

[   22.941820]        ----                    ----

[   22.941822]   lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);

[   22.941829]                                lock(&port_lock_key);

[   22.941835]                                lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);

[   22.941841]   lock(&port_lock_key);

[   22.941847]

[   22.941849]  *** DEADLOCK ***

[   22.941851]

[   22.941854] 3 locks held by getty/118:

[   22.941856]  #0:  (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c053e0e0>] 
tty_release+0x40/0x494



Changing my serial port to ttyO0 didn't fix anything.... Can anybody help 
me ??

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/157e328f-a797-4166-9f0e-41820d6ce738%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to