Hello TJF,

Thank you for the explanation that is very useful! With parsing the file, 
I'm doing that in Node-Red reading in the file as a binary buffer, but for 
some reason the buffer is 4x the number of sampling points I set. Like 
let's say I tell the script to sample the analog inputs 5000 times, the 
file will come back with 20000 when I read it into Node-Red (I'd expect 
10000 points since I'm using 2 analog inputs). What could be the cause?

Thanks!

On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 2:26:30 PM UTC-5 TJF wrote:

> Hi!
>
> [email protected] schrieb am Dienstag, 9. März 2021 um 21:15:01 UTC+1:
>
>> Specifically, they are collecting the data using Ring Buffer mode and 
>> saving it to a text file to be processed further for some feature 
>> extraction and further analysis.
>>
>> What I'm trying to understand is this: how does Ring Buffer sampling 
>> actually work? As in, if I'm reading data using two analog inputs and 
>> saving it to a text file, what order are the values in? How do I parse them 
>> into meaningful sensor values? I've attached the C code I'm working with, 
>> and greatly appreciate any help or pointers!
>>
>
> Your code doesn't save to a text file. Instead it saves the raw data to a 
> binary file. The unshifted values (0-4095) are stored as 16-bit (unsigned 
> short) binary numbers in the order as captured, like
>
> AIN-1, AIN-2, AIN-1, AIN-2, AIN-1, AIN-2, AIN-1, AIN-2, ...
>
> In order to parse the file, just read it into a buffer and access that 
> buffer by a unsigned short pointer variable. 0 (null) means 0V, 4095 means 
> 1V8. So multiply the unsigned shorts by the factor 1.8/4095 to get the 
> voltage as a real value.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/c5efd6f1-2dd7-48ee-a693-182a8710f539n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to