I've seen that discussion. Compared to normal transactions, it makes sense
a balance takes precedence. However, I think padding aught to be applied
before the balance that defines it.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, 14:46 yegle <[email protected]> wrote:

> For the first issue: balance is made at the beginning of the day, so if
> you want to assert on the ending balance on 2016-01-02, you should write it
> on 2016-01-03.
>
> I think there were some discussions about adding a closing_balance
> directive or something so you can assert on closing balance instead of
> opening balance.
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Daniël Bos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Are you aware of the following issues:
>>
>> 1. Sort order (?) is incorrect. If I have a Pad and a Balance on the same
>> date, the Balance applies first, causing an error:
>>
>> 2016-01-01 balance Assets:Bank 1,000.00 CNY
>> 2016-01-02 pad Assets:Bank Expenses:Groceries
>> 2016-01-02 balance Assets:Bank 900.00 CNY
>>
>> I'd expect pad/padding to be applied before balance assertions.
>>
>> 2. Paddings involving the same account don't work, even when they're
>> unambiguous:
>>
>> 2016-01-04 pad Expenses:Unknown Assets:Bank
>> 2016-01-05 pad Assets:Bank Expenses:Groceries
>> 2016-01-06 balance Expenses:Unknown 100.00 CNY
>> 2016-01-07 balance Assets:Bank 700.00 CNY
>>
>> I've had to deal with these cases a couple of times, and had to resort to
>> writing the transaction manually, which isn't ideal.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
> Daniël Bos
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Beancount" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CADPdpKbe_iE6fT5osz1yA3CYFmwou2s1OppXHtL%2BCoOy-a-yfg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CADPdpKbe_iE6fT5osz1yA3CYFmwou2s1OppXHtL%2BCoOy-a-yfg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Yuchen Ying
> http://about.me/yegle
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAFL5w3W2WsnEx00GhF1hHoq322EXyPXvx4dmRjQ1ydHBRpJCZw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAFL5w3W2WsnEx00GhF1hHoq322EXyPXvx4dmRjQ1ydHBRpJCZw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-- 

Best regards,
Daniël Bos

Your government is reading your email. Slow them down with encryption.

My public key: http://goo.gl/gms497 (4096 bit RSA, id EF2D5D91)
Fingerprint  : D8D0 9FBE F075 F709 7B52  2F73 326C 2123 EF2D 5D91

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CADPdpKbf8R5N-Y0tknL4SAXWOrw5Ovg1CtBaMMfVn8aPU5VBcg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to