On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> is there a profound reason (which I'm clearly missing) why #tags can be
> attached to a transaction as a whole, but not to individual postings?
>

No profound reason, just history.


It seems to me that, conceptually, if metadata are allowed to be both
> transaction-global and posting-specific, so should #tags.
>

Tags should eventually get parsed in as metadata fields.
That's still a long way way, but I view tags only as a shorthand for
metadata.


There are two workarounds for this that I can see:
>
> - use None-valued metadata, e.g.,
>
>     2014-05-05 txn "Cafe Mogador" "Lamb tagine with wine"
>       Liabilities:CreditCard:CapitalOne         -37.45 USD
>         tag1:
>         tag2:
>       Expenses:Restaurant
>
> - use metadata entries that contain tags as values:
>
>     2014-05-05 txn "Cafe Mogador" "Lamb tagine with wine"
>       Liabilities:CreditCard:CapitalOne         -37.45 USD
>         tags: #tag
>       Expenses:Restaurant
>
>   with the additional caveat that only one tag seems to be allowed as
>   metadata value, so it's cumbersome to add multiple tags this way.
>
> Is this SMOP (and if so I'll be happy to file a ticket), or am I missing
> something more profound here?
>

You're welcome to file a ticket, but I think there's already something on
the TODO list.

In any case, not a very urgent feature in my view, just a convenience.
There are much more fundamental improvements I should focus on first (doing
changes to be able to compute returns accurately, for instance).





>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Cheers.
> --
> Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o
> Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o
> Former Debian Project Leader . OSI Board Director  . . . o o o . . . o .
> « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/beancount/20161103180709.5vte7xolyi5hwtwv%40upsilon.cc.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhPvemYnvOBemUpn%2BfVTOBvGYzdfMZnJ7Gx%2B1H8zixfWLw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to