Can you say more about your treatment of multiple payees?
Context:
- If supporting multiple payees is something you guys do a lot, it should
probably be part of the regular Beancount syntax eventually (and its
grammar).
- I've been thinking for a long time that "payee" makes more sense as an
attribute of a posting instead of a transaction, but never developed this
idea further nor made my mind up about this. For instance, a syntax like
this might be more convenient to provide multiple payees:
2016-11-24 * "Shuttle to Hotel"
"Fly Shuttle" Expenses:Transportation:Bus 25.00 USD
"Surfjack hotel" Expenses:Accommodation:Tips 3.00 USD ;; Porteur
Assets:Cash
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Jakob Schnitzer <[email protected]>
wrote:
> We could actually get around this problem by changing this filter to a
> regular expression. This would make it much more powerful IMHO. Filtering
> for a single payee would behave the same way, filtering for a few, say two
> or three, would be a bit more cumbersome but filtering for a whole class,
> say everything with "restaurant", would then be possible. What do you think?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/beancount/fava/issues/422#issuecomment-263000372>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUgkwG3n80bux5qQEiGWBUdEGPjrLelks5rBxfMgaJpZM4K8Hcu>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhNm3rBELm0zHkn-atuZeGcGiSHR58ANtTrL_SHW5HRhwA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
