On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:10:22AM -0500, Martin Blais wrote: > > I think at the EOTD we just disagree on the license issue and let's > > just leave it at that. > > Except I didn't start this thread trying to agree on a license. Or on > anything else, really. I started this thread just to point out that it > is not *clear* whether Beancount is GPL2 or GPL2+. That lack of clarity > gets in the way of getting things done, e.g., packaging Beancount for > distros because they usually insist on license clarity. > > From what you wrote I understand you're now inclined to keep Beancount > GPL2 only, at least for now. Can you please make this choice apparent in > the code itself, maybe fixing the inconsistencies that I've pointed out > in my very first message in this thread, or do you prefer if I file a > issue about this? > I'll fix the inconsistencies, thanks for reporting them. Cheers (from Oahu), -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhNgUv2-%2BNGNnM-FW8Qr1C8V1vCHNOn9s_MJN6CgfcULhw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
