Hi, On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 8:54:37 PM UTC-4, Martin Blais wrote: > > Finally, if you book all the expenses under a common root (as in the > above, e.g., Expenses:Shoebox:*) you can then compute the cashflows of the > property as an investment value, including all the little crumbs. I've been > meaning to build an example text using data from my first home to show how > to do this, and how to do the above as well. > > I hope this helps, feel free to ask more questions, >
This is a long-delayed reply to this thread, but I've just found beancount and am curious about a use-case. You suggest keeping all expenses relating to a property under a common root. If you have n properties, there would be Expense:<N>:Maintenance for each property. What are the pro/cons to this, versus having just Expense:Properties:Maintenance and then #tagging each transaction with #propertyN? Thanks, -k. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/3a97ce6b-224b-4b92-a02c-1e00b5288550%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
