Can you try this patch?
https://bitbucket.org/blais/beancount/issues/191/beancountcoreinventory-should-be-a-dict



On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> So my beancount file takes a humongous time to load: about 2 minutes.
>
> bean-check -v shows:
> INFO    : Operation: 'beancount.parser.parser'
> Time: 1412 ms
> INFO    : Operation: 'beancount.ops.balance'
> Time: 9500 ms
> INFO    : Operation: 'beancount.loader (total)'
>  Time: 110842 ms
>
> My hacky solution this far has been to largely disable one of my source
> files (I have one file per account), which contains about 1.5k transactions
> out of a total of about 30k transactions. This cuts it down to about 18
> seconds. The 1.5k transactions belong to an investment account and thus
> have stock purchases (and a few sells). If I remove all the balance
> assertions in it, the beancount.loader (total) goes to about 95 seconds.
>
> I used a python profiler to further understand this: https://ibb.co/iCTjow
>
>  61% of the time goes in 'add_amount()'. I'll take a deeper look later on,
> but thought I'd post here and see if you had any feedback.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 2:14:20 PM UTC-7, Martin Blais wrote:
>>
>> The load time varies depending on the size of the file.
>> Mine takes about three seconds right now, as I maintain my entire history
>> in a single file.
>> If you want to see the breakdown of which stages take how long, run
>>
>>   bean-check -v <filename>
>>
>> I have spent almost no time optimizing anything so far, but I'm confident
>> I will eventually be able to cut the load time in half. I think a sensible
>> goal would be to ensure 10 years worth of typical transactions parse in
>> under 1 sec.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:40 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have build a script which basically sums up outstanding expenses for a
>>> specific customer account.
>>>
>>> Each time I call this script, I feel it takes too long to execute. time
>>> says         0.18 real         0.16 user         0.01 sys
>>>
>>> bean-query has similar performance, especially if I call it several
>>> times in a script.
>>>
>>> Is this specific to my environment? Who can confirm a similar experience?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Beancount" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>> gid/beancount/4c19e464-3e87-41ec-941d-80ace9f9eb7a%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/4c19e464-3e87-41ec-941d-80ace9f9eb7a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/beancount/3fd100db-40f4-4157-8a78-eb31f4248c05%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/3fd100db-40f4-4157-8a78-eb31f4248c05%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhNaU1TWuTsjBcA6qU-kev%2BrYiJF__Xg4MnA0sHPc3h1Vg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to