Hi! I've been learning beancount and have been really impressed with the thought and structure that's gone into it. I'm a bit afraid of going into a bikeshedding argument here, but is there any issue with using beancount in reverse chronological order (newest first)? So far I haven't seen any argument against it, though all the examples skew towards a normal chronological order - is the rationale for that method so it's easier to 'append' new transactions?
Cheers, Vivek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/aa49226c-15d7-4c08-9cef-b3d040e788e0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
