>From an accounting perspective, not important at all, since as you rightly pointed out they'd all be the same account.
>From an audit perspective, quite important, as that's data which can be used for verification if/when there are double or missed charges. I'd just do without them, but since the information is already there, and importers are one-time efforts (generally speaking) I figured more information is always better than less. On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:58 AM kuba jamro <[email protected]> wrote: > How important is it for you to uniquely categorise the individual RFID > transactions? > > Would they not all just end up in Expenses:Auto:Tolls anyway? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Beancount" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/9c882890-f286-43ac-8c73-a9de55af23fc%40googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAGQ70eswzGBW9xAbfGdnSBjCWun0-c6ZTsFtZ5p9GfS%3Daj-ZrA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
