Multiple postings are absolutely fine. My pay stubs have something like 20+ postings each. For your particular example, filter the postings, not the transactions.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:44 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Guys hi, > > As the title says i wonder if it's bad practice to use multiple postings. > > Sometimes i use transactions with multiple postings, example: > > 2019-09-06 * "Paid for ..." > Expenses:Business:Company1 200 USD > Expenses:Business:Company2 200 USD > Assets:Cash -400 USD > > or > > 2019-09-06 * "Paid for ... & Received" > Expenses:Business:Company1 200 USD > Expenses:Business:Company2 200 USD > Income:Business:Company1 -50 USD > Assets:Cash -350 USD > > It worked great for my needs, but now that i'd like to filter expenses/income > only related to Company1 fava filter > "any(account:"Expenses:Business:Company1)" > does not work for this type of transactions. > > So i wonder if it's better practice to use simple transactions like > > 2019-09-06 * "Paid for ..." > Expenses:Business:Company1 200 USD > Assets:Cash -200 USD > > ...... > > So one can be more flexible with filters, etc if need arises. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Beancount" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/c2eb35fd-428b-412f-a880-552887b448ab%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhMJUxAFsi3NE96Cd9jpcGHve1gpYMAkhG-5RfR1KGPGUw%40mail.gmail.com.
