On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:35 PM Kirill Goncharov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'd love for you to move that repo under "http://github.com/beancount/docs";
>> if you don't mind, that would be ideal.
>>
>
> Sure, I'll rename it.
>
> According to the GitHub documentation
> <https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/transferring-a-repository>,
> I need a permission to create repositories in organization in order to
> initiate the transfer. Can you grant me such permission?
>

I'm not able to grant at the moment, I'm merely a Member of the org; I just
asked Dominik if he'll promote me to Owner.
In any case, I've created an empty repo here:
https://github.com/beancount/docs
Are you able to push it over that (along with the history)?

If you'd prefer to move it (I didn't know it was possible to move a repo
across users) you can wait, if I have Owner ACLs I'd be happy to make that
happen.



>
> Feel free to stick your name in the generated docs somewhere as the
>> maintainer and get some credit for all that nice work.  Alternatively, I
>> have a credits file somewhere in the source repo that I can convert to a
>> Google doc, that would be an easy way to make this appear in your generated
>> docs.
>>
>
> We have a history of commits, I think that's enough.
>
>
>> At a quick glance, I notice Dominik's has a full index in the API
>> reference, and not a hierarchical one (not sure this matters):
>> https://aumayr.github.io/beancount-docs-static/api_reference/index.html
>>
>
> I didn't found a way to build such an index automatically with mkdocs.
>

No worries.



> Also your API reference is missing the "projects" subdirectory.
>>
>
> This subdirectory is not present in the beancount package downloaded from
> PyPI.
> Also, the documentation generator fails to read 'tools' subdirectory, I
> can't figure out why. But I added documentation pages for 'loader',
> 'prices' and 'web' which were missing.
>

Strange. Maybe there's something hardcoded in the generator?



>
> On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 6:13:07 PM UTC+3, Martin Blais wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:34 AM Kirill Goncharov <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >After I refresh the code and migrate the tickets, I'd love to integrate
>>> Kirill's .md docs
>>>
>>> How would you like to do that?
>>>
>>> I think it's better to keep the parser and resulting markdown files in a
>>> separate repo unless there's a compelling reason to do otherwise, as this
>>> allows frequent updates (I currently do re-parsing once a week).
>>> That being said, I would happily transfer my beancount-docs repo to
>>> https://github.com/beancount/ organization and add you as collaborator.
>>>
>>
>> Come to think of it, this makes the most sense. This way there's no need
>> to pepper the code repo with documentation updates.
>>
>> I'd love for you to move that repo under "
>> http://github.com/beancount/docs"; if you don't mind, that would be ideal.
>> It would make a https://beancount.github.io/docs/ root for that
>> documentation site, which is a pretty nice URL.
>>
>> Two more things:
>> - Feel free to stick your name in the generated docs somewhere as the
>> maintainer and get some credit for all that nice work.  Alternatively, I
>> have a credits file somewhere in the source repo that I can convert to a
>> Google doc, that would be an easy way to make this appear in your generated
>> docs.
>>
>> - Your conversikon seems like it covers all of the static docs generated
>> by Dominik, here:
>> https://aumayr.github.io/beancount-docs-static/
>> <https://aumayr.github.io/beancount-docs-static/api_reference/index.html>
>> Is this correct? Does it cover everything that is there?
>> At a quick glance, I notice Dominik's has a full index in the API
>> reference, and not a hierarchical one (not sure this matters):
>> https://aumayr.github.io/beancount-docs-static/api_reference/index.html
>> Also your API reference is missing the "projects" subdirectory.
>>
>> Let me know if I help with anything to make this happen,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 4:57:14 PM UTC+3, Martin Blais wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:28 AM Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * Martin Blais <[email protected]> [2020-05-18 04:24]:
>>>>> > Martin: Did you want to go beyond this and create a mapping?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a mapping now for some users.  For quite a few people I cannot
>>>>> find a mapping.  I think once we've done the migration, we can update
>>>>> the BitBucket issues and let them know about the move to GitHub.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I emailed some people asking for their GitHub username, so
>>>>> please give me a few days.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SGTM, I'll wait for your mapping and then I'll test it with
>>>> git-remote-hg.
>>>> Thanks a lot for your help and thanks to Kirill Goncharov for figuring
>>>> out the issues migration.
>>>>
>>>> I re-ran the hg-fast-export conversion and git-remote-hg ones last
>>>> night to see if there's any benefit to using one vs. the other.
>>>> The former fails with an exception; the latter works well.  It'll be a
>>>> git-remote-log conversion.
>>>> I diffed all the heads of branches to make sure nothing's lost; seems
>>>> to have worked perfectly.
>>>> I also spot-checked some of the per-branch logs, they also fine.
>>>> The tags are also present and matching.
>>>>
>>>> There are a few final relatively easy things I need to figure out:
>>>>
>>>> - I have some repo lying around with local changes that needs to get
>>>> merged before I make the final conversion. I'll merge those changes in hg
>>>> and reimport.
>>>>
>>>> - Mercurial has the concept of "closing" a branch (typically when it
>>>> gets merged). This results over time in a large set of "inactive" and a
>>>> smaller set of "active" branches. The conversion merely creates branches,
>>>> for both active and inactive ones. The git-remote-hg docs mention "Closed
>>>> branches are not supported; they are not shown and you can’t close or
>>>> reopen. Additionally in certain rare situations a synchronization issue can
>>>> occur (Bug #65)."  I want to figure a way to keep the branch refs / history
>>>> yet have them not show up in the list of branches (so that the little
>>>> github menu doesn't show all these closed branches as if they were work in
>>>> progress). I think I may use a tag in under archive/ like some people do to
>>>> differentiate those from tags for released versions.
>>>>
>>>> - Dominik Aumayr created the github.com/beancount/beancount repository
>>>> originally and gave me admin rights. While I'm able to pull the output of a
>>>> fresh git-remote-hg conversion on top of that repo (with a minor merge on a
>>>> tags file), I'd prefer to empty it or remove it and recreate it from
>>>> scratch with the latest version of the git-remote-hg converter.  Is this
>>>> going to cause problems? I suspect I would not since I can pull the recent
>>>> conversion on top, the checksums are probably the same and the repos would
>>>> be compatible. Have you done that before? I wonder if it's easiest to
>>>> delete and recreate the repo project in github (does github make that
>>>> possible or if I delete the repo would the beancount/beancount name be
>>>> unavailable forever?).
>>>>
>>>> After I refresh the code and migrate the tickets, I'd love to integrate
>>>> Kirill's .md docs and ask if people can remove other static docs to there's
>>>> only one copy out there and change all pointers to the repo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Beancount" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/fac47049-267d-4205-88f3-6e030e7d2039%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/fac47049-267d-4205-88f3-6e030e7d2039%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/bbc6da8c-20a5-4c0d-9292-ce9a112b8c99%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/bbc6da8c-20a5-4c0d-9292-ce9a112b8c99%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhOxdb1SxKs7tDJBrdCXdMT__ZdopUh1%2BMhVAS461dDtiQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to