Thanks, Martin! I just added another alternative around a 
`lot_basis_adjustment` metadata.

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 9:14:03 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> I just responded on your doc.
> I like the idea, I'm putting down a few more proposals to ponder.
>
> As per your proposal, I see this:
> Pros:
> + Simplified balancing rule
> Cons:
> - User has to compute the cost basis manually (but we could get creative 
> around making this easier)
> - Cost basis on individual lots loses the original share price, which 
> affects the matching rule.
>
> I'm proposing two other alternatives:
> 1. Automatically compute and insert a rebate on selling, based on the 
> commissions in the augmenting transaction
> 2. Track original and adjusted cost bases in the postings
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:53 PM Mark Lodato (Google Docs) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Mark Lodato replied to a comment in the following document
>> Beancount - V3: Goals & Design
>>
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/edit?disco=AAAAJ-oihO4&ts=5f0e619c&usp=comment_email_document&usp_dm=false>
>> Commissions in P/L
>> [image: User profile picture Mark Lodato] Mark Lodato
>> Are you considering fixing beancount's notion of cost basis so that it 
>> includes the commission? Here's an example:
>>
>> 2014-02-10 * "Buy"
>> Assets:US:Invest:Cash -5009.95 USD
>> Expenses:Commissions 9.95 USD
>> Assets:US:Invest:HOOL 10.00 HOOL { 500 USD}
>>
>> Here, beancount thinks the cost basis is 500 USD per share but in reality 
>> (according to the IRS) it is 500.995 USD per share.
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/beancount/c/B2hxF6N7y6s 
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://groups.google.com/g/beancount/c/B2hxF6N7y6s&sa=D&ust=1594777902234000&usg=AFQjCNFU7GdS-WOgqjeSXxSrrqnEDcxjIQ>
>> [image: User profile picture Martin Blais] Martin Blais
>> Yes, precisely. I have a way to do this, but it's not trivial, will 
>> require a plugin, one couldn't easily replicate this by hand.
>> [image: User profile picture Mark Lodato] Mark Lodato
>> I think it's worth considering fixing within beancount core. I put 
>> together an alternative proposal:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1af2ONEAePSAy_hwulwBrxEynKq9hvE9ZPx5u-f2PWi4/edit
>>  
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://docs.google.com/document/d/1af2ONEAePSAy_hwulwBrxEynKq9hvE9ZPx5u-f2PWi4/edit&sa=D&ust=1594781286645000&usg=AFQjCNG0SNK1JQCCISC8631exq3EH8I0Dw>
>>
>> PTAL and let me know what you think. Thanks!
>> [image: User profile picture Mark Lodato] Mark LodatoNew
>> [Edited the previous comment for tone. The original was unintentionally 
>> confrontational. Sorry about that!]
>> Open 
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/edit?disco=AAAAJ-oihO4&usp=comment_email_discussion&usp_dm=false&ts=5f0e619c>
>>
>> Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
>>
>> You have received this email because you are a participant in this 
>> thread.Change 
>> what Google Docs sends you. 
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/111332444134257847776/docos/notify?id=1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc&title=Beancount+-+V3:+Goals+%26+Design>You
>>  
>> can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/ba1318fd-4077-469c-abdf-9ca82a4ba6c8n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to