Hi Martin, 
Long-time lurker, first-time poster... I added some comments to the 
document as a starting point - hope I did it right!

I have a decent amount of experience with the treatment of corporate 
actions - would love to contribute. 

Kind regards,
Simon

On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 2:02:45 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> Moving to: 
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SC_q_t8TkLdPxglb2qcpG8q4wVe0VP-XU35FTI0ICRA/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 12:44 AM Martin Blais <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Right now, Beancount does nothing about stock splits (nor does it know 
>> about them either).
>>
>> You either (a) keep the same symbol and have a discontinuity in the price 
>> series, or (b) switch to a new symbol and have two sets of prices. I've 
>> been tending toward (a) in recent years, but in the past had used (b) -- 
>> the extra symbol bothers me. Hasn't been much of a problem so far (though I 
>> invest mostly in baskets so I only have relatively few of them).
>>
>> The price fetchers return adjusted prices for historical prices. For 
>> example, if you fetch a historical price for day X before a split, the 
>> price returned for day X will be different if you fetch it before or after 
>> the split (you have to be careful with that). It's not pretty and could 
>> lead to errors. Even with correct recording of prices on the split date it 
>> could be tricky, e.g., a trade that posts the day before a split and 
>> settles a day after it.
>>
>
>  
>
>>
>> I haven't been too concerned with errors around split dates before, but 
>> now with my recent work on computing returns, I'm having to pay a bit more 
>> attention to that, and as I'm adding price plots I'm finding some small 
>> errors in my input file if I look for info around splits.
>>
>> Has anyone done some thinking around how they'd like to see stock splits 
>> handled?
>> Obviously we cannot change the numbers in the input file itself, but I'm 
>> curious to hear if people have expectations or some clear idea about what 
>> they'd like to see in a PTA system.
>>
>> Some quickly jotted down ideas:
>> - Checking for discontinuity in the price series to highlight errors (as 
>> a script, probably).
>> - Adding explicit directives to record split information, and requiring 
>> price directives on that date.
>> - Internally associating version numbers with price points based on 
>> splits and having operations on them which take those into account.
>>
>> Not so sure how to go about it yet, I'm just starting to look into this.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/2312f29d-baef-45cb-8007-ea46172445b4n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to