On 07/10/2020 12:20, Martin Blais wrote: > Given its small size, a whole dedicated repo is a bit much, don't you think?
It is going to be a small repo :-) As Stefano pointed out, having some decoupling between beancount and the emacs mode will make managing releases easier. The presence of two active branches in the beancount git repository is also going to cause some confusion regarding which one is the canonical source for the emacs mode source code. And I would like to avoid to have to merge every patch to beancount.el twice. I think the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages (actually, I don't see any disadvantage in splitting the repositories). Cheers, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/b8d0a9e3-2fee-5370-fa94-dbd78f7541c8%40grinta.net.
